After the test subject has seen and responded to all of the inkblots (free association phase), the tester then presents them again one at a time in a set sequence for the subject to study: the subject is asked to note where they see what they originally saw and what makes it look like that (inquiry phase). The subject is usually asked to hold the cards and may rotate them. Whether the cards are rotated, and other related factors such as whether permission to rotate them is asked, may expose personality traits and normally contributes to the assessment.[31]
rorschach test cards pdf download
In addition to providing coding guidelines to score examinee responses, the R-PAS provides a system to code an examinee's behavior during Rorschach administration. These behavioral codes are included as it is believed that the behaviors exhibited during testing are a reflection of someone's task performance and supplements the actual responses given. This allows generalizations to be made between someone's responses to the cards and their actual behavior.
The Chapmans investigated the source of the testers' false confidence. In one experiment, students read through a stack of cards, each with a Rorschach blot, a sign and a pair of "conditions" (which might include homosexuality). The information on the cards was fictional, although subjects were told it came from case studies of real patients.[103] The students reported that the five invalid signs were associated with homosexuality, even though the cards had been constructed so there was no association at all.[105][106] The Chapmans repeated this experiment with another set of cards, in which the association was negative; the five signs were never reported by homosexuals. The students still reported seeing a strong positive correlation.[6][106] These experiments showed that the testers' prejudices could result in them "seeing" non-existent relationships in the data. The Chapmans called this phenomenon "illusory correlation" and it has since been demonstrated in many other contexts.[103][104]
Psychologists object to the publication of psychological test material out of concerns that a patient's test responses will be influenced ("primed") by previous exposure. The Canadian Psychological Association takes the position that, "Publishing the questions and answers to any psychological test compromises its usefulness" and calls for "keeping psychological tests out of the public domain."[129] The same statement quotes their president as saying, "The CPA's concern is not with the publication of the cards and responses to the Rorschach test per se, for which there is some controversy in the psychological literature and disagreement among experts, but with the larger issue of the publication and dissemination of psychological test content".
This is the first study to examine the effects of variation in visual stimuli as represented in features of the ORT cards on linguistic indicators of connection to emotional experience using measures of the referential process. The hypothesis that particular stimulus features of the ORT cards affect the linguistic qualities of the narratives inspired by the cards has been supported by the results. In particular, the variation from achromatic to chromatic cards, the increase in details of reality, and the greater definition of the figure contours elicit narratives with higher referential activity, measured by IWRAD. We suggest that such stimulus features may activate specific sensory, emotional and cognitive processes as represented in more vivid and immediate instantiations of emotion schemas (Bucci 1997; Bucci et al. 2016). We suggest that the color-affect and form-reality testing hypotheses that have been widely proposed in the literature also obtain new support through the linguistic measures applied here.
If projective techniques are conceived of as interpersonal methods aimed to stimulate, experience, understand and handle some specific subjective processes, then the traditional separation between diagnosis and therapy vanishes in many assessment procedures (Blatt 1975; Fischer 1994; Finn 2007). Projective techniques then can be seen as "empathy magnifiers" (Finn 2003, p. 126) and as initiators of a change process. In this sense we believe this study provides useful data for therapists who may adopt this therapeutic perspective to assessment and administer the ORT and other projective tests in their practice. It is useful for example to know that from the linguistic style of non-clinical subjects we can infer that chromatic colors trigger richer sensory information, and that more defined forms contribute to clear ideation and images. In order to foster the referential process of the patient, the therapist could choose such cards to elicit verbalizations that are more likely to evoke emotional experience of the central or problematic issues. Moreover, therapists can compare the IWRAD level of narratives told by a specific patient with the normative parameters of our non-clinical sample to detect significant deviations in specific type of cards.
Examining the effect of the number of human silhouettes on the linguistic measures we found a noteworthy result that was not predicted. We see a decrease of the narrative IWRAD values from the 1-person silhouette to the cards with two silhouettes, with three silhouettes, with a group and the blank card. We may speculate that people can generate richer, more detailed and emotionally vivid narratives by imagining situations of themselves in relation to the single individual represented by the 1-person silhouette. On the other hand, it is possible that the viewer may grasp the signals coming from the multiple actors on a subsymbolic level and be emotionally involved in the situation but have more difficulty in connecting the experience to a narrative. The possibility that complex relational situations may evoke emotion but also activate processes of simplification, distancing or defense is supported in research by Ugazio et al. (2012). The effects of differences in number of figures also remains to be tested in future work.
The results thus far have provided evidence for the ORT, combined with evaluation of the linguistic responses, as offering unique sources of information within the projective tests scenario. The breadth and systematic manipulation of the interpersonal settings prompted by the cards, combined with the effective use of colors and defined shapes, makes the ORT a powerful method offering a uniquely structured assessment of what a person perceives, experiences, and feels, and the ways a person's relationships come into being" (Knafo 2010, p. 181).
The Rorschach Test is a projective psychological test developed in 1921 by Hermann Rorschach to measure thought disorder for the purpose of identifying mental illness. It was inspired by the observation that schizophrenia patients often interpret the things they see in unusual ways. In the test, the participant is shown a series of ten ink blot cards and directed to respond to each with what they see in the inkblot. Because completing the Rorschach Test is time intensive and requires and psychologist trained in its usage, there have been many attempts to convert the Rorschach into an objective test for ease of use. The Harrower-Erickson Multiple Choice Rorschach Test was developed during World War II for the large scale screening of U.S. military personnel. The first work on the MCR reported impressive predictive power, however later work indicates that scores from the MCR have little value and the test does not appear to have been used for much in the last fifty years. This test is provided here just as a historical curiosity.
We have enlisted 10 Rorschach inkblot cards for users to download PDF cards for test purposes only. There are total of 10 cards in Rorschach inkblot test developed by the swiss psychiatrist in 1921 and these cards are design with 5 achromatic & chromatic different colors. The Rorschach test is a psychological assessment in which a person is shown inkblots and asked to describe what they see in them. The test is intended to reveal a person's thoughts, feelings, and personality traits by analyzing their responses to the inkblots. There are ten standard inkblots that are used in the test, and they are referred to as "cards." The cards are typically presented in a specific order, and the person being tested is asked to describe what they see in each one. The responses are recorded and then analyzed by a trained professional, who uses them to gain insight into the person's psychological functioning.
The fifth inkblot in the Rorschach test is considered by Hermann Rorschach himself to be the easiest to interpret, with most people seeing a bat, swallow, or butterfly. However, if a test subject sees crocodile heads in the tips of the wings, it may indicate hostility, and if they see the antennas or swallowtail as scissors, it may suggest a castration complex. Some psychologists believe that if a test subject gives more interpretations of this inkblot than the previous and following ones, numbers IV and VI, it may be a sign of schizophrenia, as they believe that this card does not contain as many images and associations as the other cards. A response of "two animals banging their heads together" would indicate struggle and fighting and be considered a negative response. Gay men may be more likely to see creatures that are half-animal and half-human on this card. A response of "It was a tough one" may indicate depression, as it takes too long to respond and this card is considered the easiest, so it should be easy to give a quick response. It's important to note that these interpretations are based on the psychologist's subjective interpretations and should be taken with caution.
In the Rorschach test, all 10 cards are designed with 5 achromatic & chromatic different colors or we can say the colors used are red, yellow, orange-brown, black, and mixed colors to make the Rorschach quiz more interesting. 2ff7e9595c
Comments